Should corporates put more money into charities?

I chaired a debate last night as part of the Marketing Society’s not for profit group. Leading the opposition was Chris Macleod, Head of Group Marketing at Transport for London, London’s largest advertiser. Seconded by expert Richard Harrison, Director of Research at The Charities Aid Foundation, working to create greater value for charities and transforming the way donations are made. And finally Neil Boorman writer, journalist and consultant, who famously lived without brands for a year.

Supporting the motion was Dax Lovegrove, Head of Business and Industry at WWF responsible for developing corporate relationships with the likes of M&S, challenging unsustainable practices. With seconder Maya Prabhu, Senior Philanthropy Adviser from Coutts & Co, where she advises and creates strategies for family foundations and also ensure issues and causes are understand. And finally, on the team Paul Farthing, High Value Relationships Director at Cancer Research UK, one of the UK’s biggest charities with over £420m income raised last year.

The debate was won by the team supporting the motion stating that the big NGOs had the expertise to address the big global challenges like CO2 emissions, AIDS and water scarcity. More cash would enable solutions to be found, developing new systems working with corporates to potentially ‘future proof’ our planet’s resources. Of the £44billion income received by UK charities only a 20th comes from corporates, is that too much to expect? The opposing team said that corporations weren’t set up to give money in this and they too called for a new model which moved away from the old fashioned ‘alms house’ giving to new ways to embed within business with better accountability at its heart. Also only the cuddly popular charities would survive – what about the less appealing causes? And shouldn’t corporate tax been used to address some of these issues?

18 comments on “Should corporates put more money into charities?”

  2. Giles Robertson on

    Not explicitly although we did touch on the need for a new model of corporate engagement where the issues (health, environmental) are fundamentally addressed through the partnership. It would seem that most corporate partnerships really do want to leverage the trust, respect and credibility held by the charities and this was argued might sometimes be given away too ‘cheaply’. Although there were examples of organisations getting behind the policy change required and not communicating it first and foremost. On a personal note, if more is spent on the communications than the programme itself, then this is edging towards ‘greenwash’.

  9. misiopisio on

    Aw, it was a really nice post. In notion I have to put in place writing like this additionally – spending time and actual effort to have a top notch article… but what can I say… I procrastinate alot and also by no indicates apparently go carried out.

  11. franek on

    I discovered your site website online and appearance a couple of your early posts. Always keep on the excellent operate. I simply extra up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Looking for forward to reading far more by you at a later date!…

  12. montaż klimatyzacja warszawa on

    Just wish to say your article is as amazing. The clarity in your post is simply excellent and
    i could assume you’re an expert on this subject. Fine with your permission allow me to grab your RSS feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the gratifying work.

  18. housekeeper san diego on

    I was curious if you ever considered changing the page layout of your blog?
    Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you
    could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it
    better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or 2
    images. Maybe you could space it out better?

Comments are closed.